David Ray Griffin is a co-director of the Center for Process Studies and one of the foremost contemporary exponents of process theology. He’s also a leading proponent of theories questioning the Bush Administration’s account of the September 11, 2001 attacks.
I was invited to a lecture of his February 10 in San Diego that mainly concentrated on subjects within his new book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, which he explained is largely a response to an article by Popular Mechanics its authors claim dispel the primary tenets of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Snippets of what he said:
- a supposed mobile phone call from a hijack victim is dubious because the specific plane in question was not outfitted with seat-back phones, nor was the technology yet available in 2001 to allow in-flight cellphone calls. He said uncanny voice-cloning technology, however, was available.
- conclusions made by the Popular Mechanics’ writers should not be considered legitimate for various reasons including how they relied on federal NIST data and did not follow a scientific process; for example, despite evidence, they presuppose the events were the work of Islamic terrorists.
The full video is above and runs about an hour. ‘Full’ meaning I ran out of tape right before the end, and also missed any and all of the Q&A held afterwards.
